Cash and brands: The two missing ingredients for regenerative agriculture to scale?

Food and farming business Wildfarmed has teamed up with Lloyds Banking Group and Nestlé to create a path for regenerative farming to move beyond niche adoption.
Food and farming business Wildfarmed has teamed up with Lloyds Banking Group and Nestlé to create a path for regenerative farming to move beyond niche adoption. (Getty Images)

Two major Wildfarmed partnerships announced this week – one with Lloyds Banking Group and another with Nestlé’s KitKat brand – point to a simple reality for regenerative agriculture. If the movement is to move beyond niche adoption, farmers must be paid for delivering environmental outcomes, and regenerative produce must find a route into mainstream consumer brands via partnerships with household names

Regenerative farming may still be far from the dominant model, but it is moving into the agricultural mainstream, with Barclays research showing that four in five UK farmers are either adopting or considering regenerative practices.

It enjoys support from policymakers, environmental groups and food companies. Evidence linking regenerative practices to improvements in soil health, biodiversity and resilience continues to build.

Yet one question remains unanswered: how do you make it financially attractive for farmers to adopt?

Two announcements involving UK regenerative food and farming business Wildfarmed offer a compelling answer.

The first tackles the economics. The second tackles demand.

Together, they illustrate a potential blueprint for taking regenerative agriculture from the margins into the mainstream.

Follow the money

Wildfarmed’s new Food & Nature Resilience Fund, launched in partnership with Lloyds Banking Group, is built around a principle that has often been overlooked in sustainability discussions: who is going to pay farmers to adopt regenerative practices, and how?

The fund aims to accelerate regenerative farming by creating new income streams for growers who deliver environmental benefits while continuing to produce food. Rather than forcing a choice between food production and nature recovery, it seeks to reward farmers for achieving both.

By pooling investment from organisations that benefit from healthier landscapes – including banks, water companies and insurers – the model attempts to align environmental outcomes with commercial returns. Early partners include Severn Trent, Affinity Water and AXA XL.

This matters because regenerative agriculture frequently requires farmers to shoulder additional risk during the transition period. Improved soil health and biodiversity may generate long-term benefits, but farmers still face annual cashflow pressures and tight margins.

If society wants farmers to produce environmental goods alongside food, those benefits must be reflected in farm revenues.

As Lloyds agriculture sustainability director Ben Makowiecki noted, creating a “more reliable financial model for farmers” is essential if regenerative agriculture is to scale.

The power of household brands

If the Lloyds partnership addresses supply, Wildfarmed’s agreement with Nestlé addresses demand.

The deal will see wheat grown under Wildfarmed’s regenerative standards incorporated into the wafer used in the 1.5 billion KitKat bars produced annually at Nestlé’s York factory.

That volume is significant. One of the biggest challenges facing regenerative agriculture has been reaching consumers at scale. Regenerative products often remain confined to specialist brands, premium retail ranges or environmentally conscious shoppers.

KitKat is the opposite. It is one of Britain’s most recognisable food brands.

For Wildfarmed, the partnership therefore offers a route to significant and predictable demand for regenerative crops.

As CEO Edd Lees put it, the ambition is to make regenerative farming “the default, not the exception”.

A brand such as KitKat provides a way to communicate the benefits of regenerative farming with the mainstream.
A brand such as KitKat provides a way to communicate the benefits of regenerative farming with the mainstream. (Nestle)

Speaking the consumer’s language

The timing is also notable. New research from EIT Food suggests that while consumers support more sustainable agriculture, terms such as “regenerative” and “resilient” have little impact on purchasing decisions. Instead, shoppers respond to tangible benefits such as taste, health, provenance and trust.

A brand such as KitKat provides a way around that communication problem. Consumers do not need to understand cover crops, reduced tillage or living roots. They simply buy a product they already know and trust.

There is an obvious caveat. Some may question whether linking regenerative agriculture to a confectionery product sits comfortably with growing criticism of ultra-processed foods. Yet, as the saying goes, “There are no solutions. There are only trade-offs.” If regenerative agriculture is to achieve meaningful scale, it must engage with mainstream food manufacturing, not just niche health and sustainability markets.

A template for the future?

Taken together, the Lloyds and Nestlé partnerships highlight what may be the two most important ingredients for regenerative agriculture’s next phase of growth.

First, farmers need stronger economic incentives and more reliable revenue streams.

Second, regenerative production must be embedded within major consumer brands capable of creating large-scale demand.

The regenerative movement has spent years proving the environmental case; the next challenge is proving the business case.

This week, Wildfarmed may have shown how both can be achieved.